Skip to main content

'Experience wears the trousers': Gender and attitude to financial risk

Entrepreneur 1340649

The research, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, examines gender differences in attitudes to financial risk, based on data from more than half a million interactions between financial advisors and their clients in the UK.

The unique database used for the project was provided by investment risk profiling company Dynamic Planner and is based on responses to ‘attitude to risk’ (ATR) questionnaires, completed by the clients before meeting with their advisors to discuss investment opportunities.

The study found that women on average have lower (self-assessed) levels of investment experience – the most important factor, it concluded, in explaining gender differences in financial risk tolerance.

However, while men are more risk tolerant in their investment behaviour than women, there is a trend suggesting the gender disparity is reducing as women become more risk tolerant and, if it continues, is likely to disappear entirely over the next two decades.

Professor Chris Brooks, one of the authors of the study, said:
“Our results have important implications for the pensions that women are likely receive in the future. As well as living longer, they have traditionally tended to invest less and in lower risk funds than men, which typically provided them with lower returns. If women are becoming more risk tolerant over time, this will hopefully bolster their pension pots in the long run.”

The study is also the first of its kind to investigate whether the client’s gender affects the extent to which, following the meeting with the advisor, the actual risk of the investment product selected differs from the client’s revealed risk preferences.

Results show that ATR scores for women are subject to greater adjustments when arriving at the final selected investment products compared with those of men – both when the women are more risk tolerant and when they are highly risk averse.

The study also analysed the levels of risk tolerance in married couples when making joint investments. By examining the factors affecting the joint outcome when a man and a woman with different individual risk tolerances select a joint investment product and thus one or both of the partners must make a compromise, it is able to shed light on who ‘wears the trousers’ in joint marital investment decision-making.

The research shows when one partner has a higher risk tolerance than his/her spouse, the final risk level selected after the meeting with the advisor is closer to that of the less risk averse partner. Additionally, researchers found that when the wife is more risk tolerant she is far more likely to have to compromise than when her husband is more risk tolerant.

The data suggests that the wife’s preferences are more likely to prevail when she is the less risk tolerant of the two parties, or when she has the relatively more senior/prestigious employment role or the higher her relative level of investment experience. Find out more about Professor Chris Brooks' research.

View profile Find out more about Mr Ivan Sangiorgi’s research.

View profile

Dr Ivan Sangiorgi

Associate Professor of Finance
Published 7 December 2017

You might also like

Top performing postgraduate student wins award

25 March 2019
Earlier this term we announced Akshat Vyas as the recipient of the CISI Educational Trust Award 2019. We are excited to hear that from the participating universities, Akshat was chosen as the top performing postgraduate student and received an additional £3000 award.

Industry Insights: Managing Fixed Income Portfolios in a Rising Interest Rate Environment

5 December 2017
In this final talk of the autumn term, Andy Bevan of Fulcrum Asset Management talked us through his view of the fixed income market.
Industry Insights reviews

Brexit does not mean Brexit

29 August 2017
Over the past few days, the UK government’s department for exiting the European Union has been publishing a series of position papers which provide some clarity in the country’s stance over some of the most critical issues it will need to reach an agreement with the EU.